CVE detail
CVE-2026-31508
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: Avoid releasing netdev before teardown completes The patch cited in the Fixes tag below changed the teardown code for OVS ports to no longer unconditionally take the RTNL. After this change, the netdev_destroy() callback can proceed immediately to the call_rcu() invocation if the IFF_OVS_DATAPATH flag is already cleared on the netdev. The ovs_netdev_detach_dev() function clears the flag before completing the unregistration, and if it gets preempted after clearing the flag (as can happen on an -rt kernel), netdev_destroy() can complete and the device can be freed before the unregistration completes. This leads to a splat like: [ 998.393867] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xff00000001000239: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 998.393877] CPU: 42 UID: 0 PID: 55177 Comm: ip Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-211.1.1.el10_2.x86_64+rt #1 PREEMPT_RT [ 998.393886] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R740/0JMK61, BIOS 2.24.0 03/27/2025 [ 998.393889] RIP: 0010:dev_set_promiscuity+0x8d/0xa0 [ 998.393901] Code: 00 00 75 d8 48 8b 53 08 48 83 ba b0 02 00 00 00 75 ca 48 83 c4 08 5b c3 cc cc cc cc 48 83 bf 48 09 00 00 00 75 91 48 8b 47 08 <48> 83 b8 b0 02 00 00 00 74 97 eb 81 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 90 90 90 [ 998.393906] RSP: 0018:ffffce5864a5f6a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 998.393912] RAX: ff00000000ffff89 RBX: ffff894d0adf5a05 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 998.393917] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffff894d0adf5a05 [ 998.393921] RBP: ffff894d19252000 R08: ffff894d19252000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 998.393924] R10: ffff894d19252000 R11: ffff894d192521b8 R12: 0000000000000006 [ 998.393927] R13: ffffce5864a5f738 R14: 00000000ffffffe2 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 998.393931] FS: 00007fad61971800(0000) GS:ffff894cc0140000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 998.393936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 998.393940] CR2: 000055df0a2a6e40 CR3: 000000011c7fe003 CR4: 00000000007726f0 [ 998.393944] PKRU: 55555554 [ 998.393946] Call Trace: [ 998.393949] <TASK> [ 998.393952] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1b0/0x2f0 [ 998.393961] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1b0/0x2f0 [ 998.393975] ? dp_device_event+0x41/0x80 [openvswitch] [ 998.394009] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0x12 [ 998.394016] ? die_addr+0x3c/0x60 [ 998.394027] ? exc_general_protection+0x16d/0x390 [ 998.394042] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 [ 998.394058] ? dev_set_promiscuity+0x8d/0xa0 [ 998.394066] ? ovs_netdev_detach_dev+0x3a/0x80 [openvswitch] [ 998.394092] dp_device_event+0x41/0x80 [openvswitch] [ 998.394102] notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0 [ 998.394106] unregister_netdevice_many_notify+0x51b/0xa60 [ 998.394110] rtnl_dellink+0x169/0x3e0 [ 998.394121] ? rt_mutex_slowlock.constprop.0+0x95/0xd0 [ 998.394125] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x142/0x3f0 [ 998.394128] ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x69/0xf0 [ 998.394130] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [ 998.394132] netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0x100 [ 998.394138] netlink_unicast+0x292/0x3f0 [ 998.394141] netlink_sendmsg+0x21b/0x470 [ 998.394145] ____sys_sendmsg+0x39d/0x3d0 [ 998.394149] ___sys_sendmsg+0x9a/0xe0 [ 998.394156] __sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xd0 [ 998.394160] do_syscall_64+0x7f/0x170 [ 998.394162] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 998.394165] RIP: 0033:0x7fad61bf4724 [ 998.394188] Code: 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bb 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d c5 e9 0c 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 [ 998.394189] RSP: 002b:00007ffd7e2f7cb8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e [ 998.394191] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fad61bf4724 [ 998.394193] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffd7e2f7d20 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 998.394194] RBP: 00007ffd7e2f7d90 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 000000000000003f [ 998.394195] R10: 000055df11558010 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffd7e2 ---truncated---
Buzz score
Why this CVE is surfacing
This all-time snapshot uses the same composite formula as Trending across a 30-year evidence window, rather than a current rolling window.
Buzz score components · mention 24.9 · diversity 15.0 · KEV 0.0 · OTX 0.0 · PoC 0.0
Why it matters now
Mention timeline
- Total mentions
- 0
- within the 30d window
- Peak daily
- 0
- highest bucket
Evidence
Source links by recency
11 source links · newest first
Information published.
vendormsrc.microsoft.comApr 30, 2026, 8:09 AM- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.htmlcert-portal.siemens.com
No excerpt available.
Vendor Advisorycert-portal.siemens.comApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PM - https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019113.htmlcert-portal.siemens.com
No excerpt available.
Vendor Advisorycert-portal.siemens.comApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PM No excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PMNo excerpt available.
Patchgit.kernel.orgApr 22, 2026, 2:16 PM
Exploit code
Public exploit repository references
Public PoC repositories are third-party, potentially unsafe artifacts. Treat their code as untrusted and use it only on authorized systems in an isolated, least-privilege environment. cvebuzz does not execute the code or verify that an exploit works.
0 repository references · best confidence N/A · max 0 stars
Related records
Similar CVEs
6 related CVEs with shared weakness or product evidence
- CVE-2026-13446CVSS 9.8 · Critical
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communic…
- CVE-2026-13445CVSS 8.1 · High
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 can allow an authenticated attacker to exploit the SaveToFile component to read and modify another user's uploaded files by specifying absolu…
- CVE-2026-8859CVSS 9.9 · Critical
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow an attacker to write arbitrary files to unintended locations due to improper input validation in the APIRequest componen…
- CVE-2026-8635CVSS 9.9 · Critical
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated users to escalate privileges to superuser by directly manipulating the database, execute arbitrary system commands, and…
- CVE-2026-8505CVSS 9.8 · Critical
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 has a vulnerability in Langflow's webhook authentication logic allows unauthenticated users to trigger the execution of any flow. The system…
- CVE-2026-8481CVSS 9.9 · Critical
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 contain a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the code validation API endpoint. The POST /api/v1/validate/code endpoint accepts u…